Many Canadian criminal cases have potentially adverse consequences for immigration status. Accordingly, when a criminal lawyer in Canada represents a client who is not Canadian citizen, it is imperative that the lawyer consider the two distinct grounds of criminal inadmissibility described in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act 1 (IRPA)—A36(1), which addresses “serious criminality” and applies to both foreign nationals and permanent residents, and A36(2), which addresses “criminality” and applies only to foreign nationals. For a discussion by Dentons Toronto immigration partner Henry Chang on their respective implications, as well as the impacts of federal, provincial and juvenile offenses, as well as conditional sentences, please click here.
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
RELATED POSTS
An analysis of Canadian travel restrictions due to the COVID-19 outbreak
By
Henry Chang and Helen Park
Federal legalization of hemp in the United States and its effect on US immigration laws
By
Henry Chang
Immigrant investors find Canada’s door is closed
The Canadian government has decided to permanently cancel the federal investor program and wipe out the backlog of 65,000 applications […]
By
Helen Park
